<www.moneyweb.co.za/in-depth/investigations/nova-breaches-the-compan ies-act-for-the-eighth-straight-year/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR1xLgkGIRr0y UNqBw3TjHCkOfVvlDaYtMGC6rjvGdU3T3Rj5S4tQjGDmwU_aem_rtMAnDGWjxZk_vFyUSolRw> www.moneyweb.co.za/…/nova-breaches-the…/
or:
<www.ndcag.co.za/go/20240917> www.ndcag.co.za/go/20240917
What does this hold this time around? Is it “just” another occasion of trouble with the auditors who, yet again, may not be willing to sign off the accounts?
Note in the Moneyweb text that there is no definite statement confirming that the statements have even been submitted to them
Will the comments out of CIPC mean any early action against Nova? In light of their history and this latest failure to meet the requirements of the Companies Act regarding publication of the financial statements the CIPC response could be more serious this time
On the other hand, given the (supposed) imminent release of their Interim Report on their investigation into Nova and the Sharemax shut-down, perhaps any action will be delayed until the investigation outcomes are finalised and consequent actions begin?
<www.moneyweb.co.za/in-depth/investigations/nova-breaches-the-compan ies-act-for-the-eighth-straight-year/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR1-CnyGgyERl 9yTbPj5AhhEum6K-EFBNBBty4coyypNY0mRMOzyWI0MM4Y_aem_RRsraCDUuH9KWYuRQcNjeQ>